A funny thing happens around the time of training camp. Fans start
making their annual trek over to Showare Center where they pick apart each and
every single play and event. They pick every moment apart as if there is a
hidden scoreboard that keeps track of positive plays and negative plays and by
the end of camp the players who make the team are the ones who simply played
the best over a 3-4 day period.
So let me get this
straight... we're going to
evaluate players based on a few
short days rather than evaluating them based on the dozens of
games they played in front
of scouts last year in
addition to the 3 or 4 days of training camp?
I would have to
hope that the coaching staff had largely already decided who they wanted to
make the roster this season prior to camp. That doesn't mean that a player with an extremely
strong camp can't crack the roster but I would hope their evaluations are based
on a whole lot more than a small handful of scrimmages.
This relates very
directly to what I believe the Thunderbirds should do with their Over Age situation. The decision on whether to keep Brad Deagle,
Luke Lockhart, Chance Lund or Brendan Rouse to round out the two remaining 20
year old spots on the roster should probably be based on their body of work and
not just a few days of camp.
In my mind, I
think Deagle probably has to make this roster, leaving the choice down to Lockhart, Lund or
Rouse. Deagle was the most solid and reliable defender last
year, including Theodore.
I've seen some
claim to believe that the team has "plenty of D" with the acquisition
of Jesse Forsberg. They believe that adding Forsberg makes Deagle redundant on the roster... or something to that effect.
For the sake of
entertainment... let's see what that would look like:
Let's say Deagle
isn't on this roster. Your top pairing is probably
Forsberg and Shea Theodore. Your second pairing is likely to look something
like Evan Wardley and Jared Hauf. No disrespect to either of those
players (both of whom I like on various levels) but I think you are taking a
major risk if you're going into the season asking those guys to play 20-25
minutes a game. Phil Pietroniro might fit into that equation somewhere
and so might Jarret Smith or Kevin Wolf or Reid Fritzke or Taylor Green. None
of those players have been battle tested within the WHL.
So, do you feel comfortable with those guys as your top 4 after
surrendering 292 goals in 72 games last year? At a rate of just over 4 goals a
game? Quite frankly, I don't. And again, that isn't a knock on Wardley or
Hauf. I really like what I've seen from Wardley and I think Hauf has a chance
to eventually turn into a very good player.
If you get rid of
Deagle, you're keeping two of Lockhart, Lund and
Rouse. For the sake of argument I'll group Lund and Rouse together. Look how
many forwards this team might have (in no particular order):
Sheen
Honey
Elliot
Hickman
Alos
Sanvido
Lockhart
Lund/Rouse
Lipsbergs
Delnov
Swenson
Troock
Holub
Low(?)
Wray(?)
Folk/Ross (?)
That makes 18
possible forwards. You have established depth at the forward position, something you don't really have on the blue line.
If you keep Deagle
and go with Lockhart (or Lund/Rouse, whatever) as your final OA spot.... You
now look like this:
Forsberg -
Theodore
Deagle - Wardley
Hauf - (whoever)
I suddenly feel a
lot more comfortable about a defense where Hauf/Wardley are getting 15-20
minutes a night with Deagle, Forsberg, Hauf and Wardley eating up PK
minutes to free up Theodore to play a ton of PP minutes to go with his normal
minutes.






